the Red PIll & Indy 4 and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

"If this weren't your only lifetime, this weren't your only timeline, this weren't your only galaxy, would *you* be an alien?" - eve11

I was recently asked my opinion of the paranormal and alien beings aspect of Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.

What follows is more than mere movie spoilers. If you're squeamish about taking the Red Pill (especially in regards to alien beings or the so-called paranormal), you may want to skip this post altogether. I was called as never before to share my uncensored, straightforward thoughts (as much as I've written publicly, my totally uncensored musings are quite rare). The sheer amount of disinformation that is being leaked, and circulating these days urges me to write, although my preference is to operate under the radar. I rather be utterly silent than speak untruths, lately.

Don't worry if you don't think you're 'ready' to recall truths now or not. You can skip this post. Anytime anyone cares to sincerely to find truth, they do - even if it's like needle in haystack of propaganda. (Needles in haystack are electromagnetic, too.) You can always choose again.

I'm wavering. Losing courage. When, now, I walk into the neighborhood coffee shop. Coffea, for a cafe au lait and WiFi. Do I publish, or do I not? I walk in to see the owner wearing this T-shirt: "In Coffea there is truth." So here goes....

The paranormal aspect of the film is the easiest to address. The Russian military scientist in Indiana Jones 4 references exploration of the paranormal for psychic warfare and ways to "control the mind of Man" yet never was anything of the like employed within the movie. Only bumbling brute force was ever witnessed through every scene.

However, the movie in and of itself is an attempt in mind control by the military-entertainment complex. Which doesn't mean you shouldn't watch it as it's not the first nor last instance, but use your discernment and keep your eyes wide open.

A friend steeped in hypnosis training noted the trailer preceding the beginning of Indy 4 flashed, "We will control you." He announced aloud in the theater: "Of course, you will awaken to a non-suggestible state." A couple of people chuckled. (We were setting the intention of not being hypnotized by the suspension of disbelief that movie-watching fosters.)

For the benefit of your own soul growth, you may chose to participate in the illusion of mind control, yet your Self knows it cannot control or be controlled.  It's all unique choice - no telling what helps you flower into expressing more infinite you. Some of my most traumatic moments in hindsight were the turning points and catalysts (though kicking my butt) in my evolution.

When your knowing allows knowing you are not your body, you will be aware of fourth density (4D). When your knowing allows knowing you are not your mind either, you will be aware of fifth density (5D). Then the real adventure begins, and the most adrenaline action-packed movie will pale juxtaposed beside the limitlessness of embodied oneness.

There are several seeds planted in your mind (4D) by the film. That is, seeds besides the typical entrainment of the linear formula: the ol' good guys versus the bad guys to drum in the frequency of 3D duelity/duality. As well as the typical power over others as the ultimate prize/reward. (Good news: There is nothing that could whatsoever be planted, hooked, or otherwise cling to your ungraspable flowing 5D-plus self, so no worries.)

"Until I was 28 we knew only about our own galaxy. In 1923 Hubble discovered another galaxy. Since [then] we have discovered 2 billion more." - Buckminster Fuller

Before you read further, watch this short 5-minute video for sense of how 5D-plus "alien" beings interact.

In contrast to that multi-dimensional video, the Indy 4 film seeks within fourth-density (includes mental and emotional body) to strew these ideas on the fertile or infertile (again, entirely your choice) ground of your mind:

The storyline features ancient cultures worshiping 'gods from the sky' that provided ancient peoples with culture, and technologies such as agriculture. The fact that these so-called gods of myth were extraterrestrial in origin is not entirely a novel concept -- except there is a subtle impression given in the film that the ETs were advanced, benevolent teachers who simply valued knowledge. Whereas the fact is that any galactic being prone toward intervention, and interference has not evolved beyond 3D/4D awareness. "Let everyone be as they are," as one of my teachers, Adyashanti, states is a 5D context.

"Their treasure was knowledge," was one of the catchphrases of the film. These ETs -- known to not just ancient civilizations as the film's Roswell, NM reference means to hint it's privy to current American civilization too -- believed knowledge was power. (Gives you some inkling of their hunger for keeping knowledge occulted, or in other words, hiding more knowledge than they shared.) Knowledge of 4D thought-forming may temporally give one being (happens between Earthlings too) power over another whom dismisses their innate power, mind, thought, and/or identity with infinite omnipotence.

Lest we forget, the victors write history, so it would be more accurate to state many civilizations did not so much worship these groups of ETs, as they were in fear of them, and felt beholden to them as a captor is to their prison guard.       

The storyline also seems to serve to obfuscate what may be truer crystal skull "legends". Now, here I am speaking totally outside my own knowing, although referencing trusted sources. Stewart Swerdlow, in True Blood Blue Blood, says the original crystal skull (he says just one, although copies constructed by others) was fashioned by beings outside our galaxy without a conflict of interest in Earth or its destiny as a planetary being, and it holds the truth of the origins of humanity. Notably, the Mitchell-Hedges crystal skull holds the shape of a female human - not any 'alien' form.

Another way the film obfuscates is that I've been told the merkaba, or light body of a 5D-plus being within physicality is of a crystalline nature (heard through too many sources to cite).  Crystalline/silicate based life form as humanity's next evolution? Now I don't know if this is or is not so, but crystal skeletons are very much in vogue in the film, so there's a hint that maybe these heralded 'gods from the sky' are 5D or greater, which isn't true. Only 3D/4D beings could be attracted to reside on a 3D planet. A 5D being wouldn't resonate at Earth's frequency for very long during the Incan timeline (to 3D eyes, they'd appear somewhat angelic to those that "had eyes to see"), and wouldn't come without being invited. Due to resonance of indivisible oneness, 5D beings are available, not intrusive. (And 5D beings have no need for sustenance through agriculture, or ritual sacrifices.)       

As I perceive it, this movie is part of a larger agenda to convince audiences that ancient cultures did not in fact worship anonymous, invisible wizard(s) in the clouds, but they had a direct relationship(s) with visible wizards from the clouds - i.e., ETs from other planets. Those whom have felt the ineffable presence of Presence know for yourselves that both these "wizard" god story-lines fall far short of the nature of reality.

The set-up is that these ET beings are special, that we owe our existence, heritage and allegiance to them, and the kicker is they can trace their "divine" lineage through to the present generation. My instinct tells me we may be told in time whom these particularly holier than thou individuals roaming the Earth are -- don't fall for it.   

They are hurrying to cover up the real truth before it's self-evidently obvious: That each and every one of us is divine, everything is holographic part, parcel and whole of divinity, and everyone evolves into a responsible, sovereign creator-god. The reason we cannot remember these simple facts is that these groups of ETs conveniently made sure that that history was eradicated.

Now if you've read this far, it all sounds eerily like a same old linear good guys versus the bad guys scenario. So, are we now in midst of this theater in the flesh? -- where devious ETs (masquerading as superior technological and spiritually evolved leaders) actually intruded on innocent human civilizations of yore, and now return to claim their divine rule and inheritance? (Catch the "return" references repeated in the film?) Nope. That would be the same old same old 3D context.      

"Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing  and rightdoing, there is a field. I will meet you there." - Rumi

This isn't about judging good and evil. This isn't about jumping into reactionary flights nor fights. It's what is so.

From a 4D perspective, each and every experience - which doesn't need a label of either good/evil - it just is what is - weave together and culminate in a tapestry of richness of your expression. You experience a wide diversity of roles and scenarios, including at times oppressor and oppressed as a grand learning experiment in creatorship. From a 5D perspective, you have explored and embraced great expansions of infinity, extreme and nuanced gradiations of energy and light and sound and love, even unto the parts of Self that once were deemed unlovable and unforgivable...which paradoxically re-deems it. The more multidimensional you become aware, the more perspectives you can hold simultaneously and quantumly encompass.

This is a time of radical self-acceptance and self-forgiveness. A time of embracing every fragment of your soul that you've dusted under the rug, thrown into the farthest corners of the ethers, and/or pushed away as "not" (ever ever) "me". Because once you know who you are, you know yourself as all that is - and you can't come to an abrupt end at the good guys.

You don't come to an end...

...at all.

in Lak'ech,
(a Mayan greeting meaning "I AM another you") 

p.s. Oh, yeah, they're not inter-dimensional beings. They're multi-dimensional beings, just like you - big deal. Although one may travel inter-dimensionally in those ships, I'd prefer basic teleportation myself. Space between spaces? Poetic, perhaps. The IMDB movie FAQ claims "spaces between space" refers to the fourth dimension, but this explanation is inadequate and inaccurate. The time-space system is one, and not only, construct; and the time is ripe to consider becoming attuned to the energy-matter system.

Oh, and Mutt Williams, we're all mutts bred from stardust, in yet another sense.

The crystal skull as a protection mechanism (Harrison Ford uses it almost a shield) isn't necessary. In 4D, (what is normally called occult sciences simply uses intentional imagination) you could give an object these properties; but it's simpler - no heavy skulls needed - to visualize yourself within specific colors and geometry for protection. In 5D, your defenselessness is your safety.

Everything is electromagnetic, especially the truth. Not sure why the crystal skull super-attracts metallic yet repels organic beings. Much of the movie throws random dramatic ingredients to spice it up - it doesn't always hang together cohesively.

Another mystery is why being from Zeta Reticular in body bag is supposedly dead, although preserved in flesh, and the others are hibernating in a skeletal form "waiting". In upper dimensions, there is no death and there certainly is no such thing as "waiting". This just doesn't hang together. And it's quite doubtful that Zetas (aka Grays) were among the ET races that were "worshipped" in earlier cultures. They are simply the most recognizable in this current age.

The Death Dagger Falls scene would have been more believable if they'd levitated - seriously. As a whitewater kayaker, I can verify that the Death Dagger Falls scene was beyond class 6 rapids - not navigable whatsoever - unless they got out of the 3D mindset when they where in when they went over cliff.

Bonus: This is a time of false prophets and false profits, so I don't recommend most Google-able sources of galactic conspiracy, and sensationalized origins of humanity resources as they serve more to distract one into the machinations of the enthralling us versus them story, rather than enlighten you us is them. That you are part, parcel and whole. You are also the script, script-writer, lead actors, bit parts, set, props, audience, the whole she-bang.

Keep what resonates, trust yourself over any and all 'expert' and/or 'divine' sources, and throw the rest away.

UPDATE 7/14/08: Having had the opportunity to really contemplate uninterrupted all on my own without external influences, I am totally doing an about face on this post. Yes, there has been a galactic history of aliens et al as slave-masters on Earth, however there is more than I can go into in this post. I just wanted to disclaim what i wrote here in integrity to my true self and your true self. I completely disavow all New Age claims of soul evolution and multidimensional ladders to Oneness as I have written here and in the past. I will be writing more about going within for your answers, and staying true to your true self even if everyone else seems to have more clever answers.

Art credits spherical flower of life via Andromedan Perspectives site; Double Tetrahedron In Metatron's Cube, by Charles Gilchrist; Fantasy, photo by pilot/coach Russ; photo of Second Life "city" TU Delft via MindBlizzard blog
 

Comments

[David Burn]

Thanks for taking the time to write this. And for giving us your "totally uncensored musings." I don't believe Spielberg set out to expand anyone's consciousness with this latest action-packed installment. Although, for the "average" viewer, the movie might provoke some deeper thinking. If a viewer comes away with the belief that Earth's creatures are not alone in the universe, that's a step in the right direction. Of course, the ETs are portrayed as frightening beings, so that's not exactly comforting.

The thing I like to think about is that our Earthly ancestors were more in tune with nature, thus, by extension more in tune with the cosmos. In other words, Earth was a more inviting place for ETs prior to the industrial revolution and the planet's inhabitants, superstitious though they might have been, would have made for better friends. Take the Anasazi. Where did they go without a trace all those centuries ago? To another world via a spaceship or via teleportation. Not sure that it matters which method they used, just that they were conscious enough to go.

[Isa]

Very enjoyable read, thank-you-so-much, whatta great mirror I've been looking into today !! ;)

[Evelyn Rodriguez]

Hi David, So far I've gotten a flurry of email and private Twitter messages on this post, but as you see few open comments. So thanks for writing.

Thank you Isa. That was precious.

To respond to your comment, David...
I wrote this because alien abductee Whitley Streiber is a popular sci-fi writer and filmmaker -- rather than an outcast -- so maybe it'd be alright. (I should say I don't trust Streiber; I go by my own discernment here.) And I write because it felt time to.

I think we've been indoctrinated not to be open to possibilities, and that prematurely closes a lot of doors of perception. (For instance- ETs don't exist. Dreams aren't 'real.') Whereas, the shamanic view is totally expansive - if you can conceive it, it's real. And then, you open yourself to get your 'proof' if you will. (Like attracts like...electromagnetic...a bit like law of attraction). I HIGHLY recommend the true story "Of Water and the Spirit," by Malidoma Some. And if more scientifically oriented, "The Yoga of Time Travel." As well as "No Boundary" by Ken Wilber - which helped me obliterate my rigid notion of time-space.

I see time (past-present-future) as simultaneous, yet also I view as spiraling in upward evolution like Mayans...though, I keep one foot in future more so than past. So I don't think Incans or Anasazis or any ancients had necessarily any advantage. The next couple years (starting right NOW) should be fascinating - predict humankind will boldly go where none has gone before, if we don't shut the door prematurely and predetermine what is possible and what is impossible.

Stephanie Azaria wrote today, in reference to Mars Phoenix, which I thought really captured this sense of open:
"What happens above happens below, and while this is easy enough to understand, it is also profoundly important to realize that what happens below also happens above. Scientists are riveted to what they are about to find. The Truth is, we have spent many millennia inhabiting Mars and there is much to be retrieved there. We cannot find that information if it isn’t even a remote possibility in our consciousness, so let’s open up to the Truth." - 5/30/08 Stephanie Azaria, http://www.thecosmicpath.com

[David Burn]

Thanks for the recommendations. "Of Water and Spirit" sounds like a book I might like (from the Amazon descriptions I just read). I used to read a lot of these kind of books over a decade ago, but I somehow slipped back into more linear texts since. I sometimes wonder why that is, but I know one of the reasons. As much as the thinking presented is attractive to me, the language itself often falls short. It's not earthy enough for my tastes. But this book might be. I'll pick it up and see.

p.s. I'm glad to know you're optimistic about the future of humankind.

[Tjahjokartiko Gondokusumo]

"We will control you." simply if I can define parallelism ..... please back to the early vision of this great Crossroads Dispatches...I am sure the question is not "How many dimension we can have" but "How we can imagine the framework of the creator"...or control systems.

[Ole Ship]

A time of embracing every fragment of your soul that you've dusted under the rug, thrown into the farthest corners of the ethers, and/or pushed away as "not" (ever ever) "me".
"Very interesting views of many subjects, ones that may have many points where any knowledge or truth in need to seek advice could be hard to find, if there is any existing at all; in all, very informative and interesting to these mysteries and the of the film very good, though I haven't seen it yet. I'm sure I will get to that, if to just see for myself whether I've made sence now, or a muck,... or both with hope of less of the "me" muck..
I did look at the links in the bonus.

To save a little reading (and the character count limit) here, I'll link the path I took to my taking on this post (I still have to watch the 5-minute video for sense of how 5D-plus "it or et" interacts) as I gather me, "Ole_Ship"(O.S.) view; in gathering, here is where I am at, in order of times that have past to present:
http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2007/01/what_are_you_op.html http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2007/01/whats_your_drea.html
http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2007/01/ever_wonder.html

Mixing pieces of the thoughts above http://ole-ship-blog.profile.typekey.master.com/texis/master/search/showmsg.html?id=4739ff7420&q=+A+time+of+embracing+every+fragment+of+your+soul+&Catid=4693c6c84#m4739ff7420

[Ole Ship]

I clicked on a link http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7075030.stm and right away...well I hope its of context, I've already gone "adding links overboard", and believe it or not,
the attempt was to address getting away from the "I" part in explanations, and just the fabric to understanding; knowledge, truth, wisdom, and understanding, may all have some unique diferentials.

So to skip the sermon or preaching of my own,( especially since I'm not a preacher and never even educated in any formal theology school) a sort of talk or religious forum I listened to's host who was a preacher or minister(or some title) who kept trying to point out that the subject was the focus of the instruction to learn and not to except because or because not -of the teacher it comes from; in that, the knowledge that is taught is the student's, or listeners, to... (whatever; anymore and it will sound like I'm preaching...)
To pull back and bring this comment in to some landing, a link I found colectively, even to the do or don't search engineS' results and sensationalizing, was this one_, strike that to say instead were these:
http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/GodsandGodessesEquality.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4566526.stm

with only one remaining thought, to the Galactic child pictured; the star system seems familiar but I just cant place it... is it the Pleiades, the Libra constellation, or maybe like the nebula Eagle or Orions belt; to symbols and stories, creation, and traveling along.

[Ed]

A more useful (well, to me) interpretation of "spaces between space" is the zeroth dimension, a place were all space is a single point, a single point that touches every higher-dimensional point. Moving through this place back into a higher dimension would appear to be teleportation.

[suiseeJek]

http://www.wheretobuyugg.co.uk/womens/bailey-button-ugg-boots/bailey-button-mini-3352-ugg-boots--sand-p_381.html
http://www.wheretobuyugg.co.uk/womens/bailey-button-ugg-boots/bailey-button-triplet-1873-metallic-ugg-boots--gray-p_329.html
http://www.wheretobuyugg.co.uk/womens/bailey-button-ugg-boots/bailey-button-krinkle-1872-metallic-ugg-boots--chestnut-p_259.html
http://www.wheretobuyugg.co.uk/womens/jimmy-choo-ugg-boots/jimmy-choo-fox-fur-5531-ugg-boots--black-p_163.html
http://www.wheretobuyugg.co.uk/accessories/earmuff/mens-ugg-earmuffs--chestnut-p_126.html mens Chestnut Ugg Earmuffs