"Direct Marketing by the Numbers", "E-Mail and Online Marketing", "Marketing Writing: The Art of Persuasion", "Copywriting That Gets Results", "Sales Lead Management", "Power of Market Research"...reads the list of courses when I flip open the UC Santa Cruz Extension in Silicon Valley catalog lying on the dining room table.
I scan the abstract for "The Power of Market Research" (historically one of my favorite marketing tasks) and a few bullet points pop out:
- Assessing and defining market trends: segmenting the target market, trends driving user demand, market risks and opportunities and market forecast
- Profiling the customer: surveys, focus groups, user perceptions of products and demand for specific features
- Using market research to drive the business plan: investment analysis, program risk, profit plan
A new course piques my interest:
NeoMarketing (new!) ...explores the emerging paradigm shift from traditional push marketing to consumer-driven, anytime-anywhere pull marketing... Participants will learn about new techniques (online word-of-mouth marketing, viral marketing, and social networking) and new tools (forums, wikis, blogs, podcasts, RSS feeds, and wireless). Based on the fundamental principles of marketing, NeoMarketing utilizes new technologies for even greater competitive advantage. Emphasis will be placed on how to integrate the new techniques and tools into traditional marketing plans and how to measure the results..."
I close the page, and set the catalog down. Glumly.
I'd royally flunk these courses. Purposefully.
I don't market many of those ways anymore.
And that probably explains why I'm not writing much these days about marketing. I enjoy doing marketing but not explaining hows since.... I'm on the lunatic fringe.
That's not necessarily meant to be a derogatory term, the lunatic fringe catches onto future trends way ahead of the alphas and the alphas adopt ahead of the bees whom really spread the buzz (according to The Anatomy of Buzz-speak) to the mainstream.
Lunatic fringe: kinda edgy and hip-sounding, but let's face it, everyone thinks you're looney as they sidle away (as if it might be contagious).
Eccentric, witty artist to me at Web 2.0 party last week: You're probably the only person here who'll talk to me for any length of time.
Me: Probably right.
Lewis Carroll's imagination took flight I imagine precisely because he didn't give a hoot if you thought he was looney. He mastered a coy blending of logic and fantasy that slipped in confoundments and startlements.
Carroll always leaves me feeling saner in a world that irrationally worships the rational. Carroll always leaves me questing: Is the universe a comedy?:
"“Its jam every other day. Today isn’t any other day, you know”, said the Queen.
“I don’t understand you,” said Alice. “Its dreadfully confusing!”
“That’s the effect of living backwards,” the Queen said kindly. “It always makes one a little giddy at first … ”
“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in astonishment. “I never heard of such a thing!”
“But there’s one great advantage in it … that one’s memory works both ways”, said the Queen.
“I’m sure mine only works one way. I can’t remember things before they happen”, remarked Alice.
“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards,” the Queen remarked." - Alice in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll via Crossroads Dispatches' reader (at least that how I think we met) Michael Gisondi's motivational newsletter
If you would ask me what kind of death sends shivers down my spine -
it is not a demise from an illness like cancer, nor being hit by a bus,
nor being mauled by a shark, nor being bowled over by the freight train force of a tsunami.
Nope, none of those. I have a fear of being burned at the stake.
The only salve I have found to keep this fear at bay is to hang out more with artists - they're all loonier than I. (Don't restrict yourself to living artists in your hood. Try Salvador Dali. Jack Kerouac. David Lynch. We could go on and on.) In their presence, a welcome mat unfurls, "Finally, girlfriend, where have you been hiding?"
one a.m. in December, wyatt texts: whoA! slow down...endorphins!
me: what r u talking?
wyatt: movies in my head gotta write to music
Ah, so it works the same way for others too.
I saw the stunning Chasing the Lotus at X-Dance Film Festival last week. I knew right then and there that surfing was my true heart's sport. (In my tangible life, my sports have mainly been endurance-related: ultrarunning, hiking and backpacking, river running.)
When I changed my blog's descriptor a few months ago, I don't think it was an accident that I used the words "from the surf's edge on innovation, design, marketing, the art of living and anything that screams Life."
radical: from 1970s surfer slang meaning "at the limits of control."
The etymology of radical also means getting to the root, going to the essential. The essence of.
With 20/20 hindsight I realize it's been my saving grace that I'm too lazy to mess around with focus groups and stats and playing the numbers game (whether that's tossing out 10,000 flyers or scoring a link on Engadget's blog or an invite to Oprah). So I stumbled onto a marketing that suited me and a marketing that distilled to essence. A marketing that got ultra-specific right down to the individual human rather than sending out blasts in hopes that 2% of someones, anyones, might bite.
So I haven't gotten around to answering the thin-slicing your brand, thin-slicing stores, tag (yet). Because I don't thin-slice. ("What we feel as intuition is really the result of unconscious rapid cognition", opines Paul Marsen's summary of Blink. Thus thin-slicing is a 'neat cognitive trick'.)
About six years ago I took a course on intuition because I honestly didn't know what 'intuition' really meant or how it really operated in my own life. I was guided by my intellect and rationale and control and will. All I knew going in to the course is that I must have really been out of touch with my intuition and ability to 'read' people when I took the dot-com CTO position with founders that wildly blind-sided me.
So maybe Blink is about rapid cognition. That's a fine subject.
But that's not at all what I'm doing. Ease is my byword. Sounds so easy, ease.
Ease sometimes finds me surfing the edge between exhilaration and terror (as if screaming through the roller coaster ride does anything). Oh, yes, the Queen foretells that living backwards (that's the codeword) will be giddy at first.
And radically, dude, I'm ceding control more and more often to a non-cognitive (yet not supernatural) intelligence that I cannot define. Let the ocean do the work, man, rather than bracing myself at the limits of control. (Drag is decidely not ease.)
Neat cognitive tricks are just that. Far far too much efforting. I am a supreme surf bum, alright. I'm not killing myself manufacturing waves when there's gorgeous blue swells coming to me all the time.
Steven aka Vaspers the Grate has no idea how much I fully think he comes close to hitting the mark with his e-book (intended as a parody, hmmm...): Spiritual Slothfulness: Laziness as a Catalyst for an Extraordinary Life. As if this doesn't come straight from the mouth of a surfer, I don't know: "Achieve tremendous mystical powers and insights, by doing next to, or exactly, nothing!"
Anyhow, not like I'm going to reveal my radical looniness all in one swell, but this is a bit closer to how my intuition works in practice:
"...Alice started to her feet, for it flashed across her mind that she had never before seen a rabbit with either a waistcoat-pocket, or a watch to take out of it, and burning with curiosity, she ran across the field after it, and fortunately was just in time to see it pop down a large rabbit-hole under the hedge.
In another moment down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again." - from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll
"Oh, dear! What nonsense I’m talking!" she mumbles to herself. "It's high time to bid adieu and hit the waves."
p.s. Probably not the smoothest post I've ever written. But considering I started off typing this post with tremoring hands and hyperventilating, well...
One can never be certain that burning at the stake is passé even in this day and age.
p.p.s. Wonderful how Lewis Carroll slips into the stream, eh? Mike of White Rabbit Group tagged Tom who tagged me...curiouser and curiouser...!
images artist Lovisa Ringborg's "following the white rabbit"...Lovisa says, "in my work I am interested in the borders between fantasy and reality" - lovely, do yourself a big favor and check out all her ethereal work; artist allibee's "High Priestess" tarot card; artist Sophia Dixon's "Burning at the Stake"; "Alice down the Rabbit Hole" by Fleur Palau
Bonus: "Thin-slicing is a neat cognitive trick that involves taking a narrow slice of data, just what you can capture in the blink of an eye, and letting your intuition do the work for you... Evolution has honed our social intelligence, allowing us ‘read’ people accurately based on fleeting first impressions – which is why the current trend of speed dating might actually be a good idea. In fact, we don’t even need to actually meet our potential future partners in the flesh; just a quick peek in their bedrooms is enough to accurately guess their key personality traits...
[Actually very very few people 'read' others accurately. Typically one sees your own projections reflected back. Although I've spent the last five years working on recognizing my projections, I've yet to 'read' with 100% accuracy.]
Blink draws from cognitive psychology to explain how our powers of thin-slicing intuition have nothing to do with the supernatural, and everything to do with our naturally evolved ‘adaptive unconsciousness’. Our conscious mind is just the tip of the cognitive iceberg and what we feel as intuition is really the result of unconscious rapid cognition, fast and frugal information processing that goes on subliminally." - "Speed Thinking: A Review of 'Blink' by Malcolm Gladwell", by Paul Marsden
"How you think matters more than what you think."
It's a matter of judgment style, first expressed by the ancient Greek warrior poet Archilochus: "The fox knows many things; the hedgehog one great thing."
The idea was later expanded by essayist Isaiah Berlin. In Tetlock's interpretation, Hedgehogs have one grand theory (Marxist, Libertarian, whatever) which they are happy to extend into many domains, relishing its parsimony, and expressing their views with great confidence.
Foxes, on the other hand are skeptical about grand theories, diffident in their forecasts, and ready to adjust their ideas based on actual events.
The aggregate success rate of Foxes is significantly greater, Tetlock found, especially in short-term forecasts.
And Hedgehogs routinely fare worse than Foxes, especially in long-term forecasts. They even fare worse than normal attention-paying dilettantes--- apparently blinded by their extensive expertise and beautiful theory.
Furthermore, Foxes win not only in the accuracy of their predictions but also the accuracy of the likelihood they assign to their predictions--- in this they are closer to the admirable discipline of weather forecasters.
The value of Hedgehogs is that they occasionally get right the farthest-out predictions--- civil war in Yugoslavia, Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, the collapse of the Internet Bubble. But that comes at the cost of a great many wrong far-out predictions--- Dow 36,000, global depression, nuclear attack by developing nations.
Hedgehogs annoy only their political opposition, while Foxes annoy across the political spectrum, in part because the smartest Foxes cherry-pick idea fragments from the whole array of Hedgehogs.
Bottom line... The political expert who bores you with an cloud of "howevers" is probably right about what's going to happen.
The charismatic expert who exudes confidence and has a great story to tell is probably wrong.
And to improve the quality of your own predictions, keep brutally honest score.
Enjoy being wrong, admitting to it and learning from it, as much as you enjoy being right.
Posted by: Franklin Mint Julip | Jan 31, 2007 at 02:39 AM
Thinking? Did I say anything at all about cognition? As the Buddhists say, the mind is another sense. It's as useful as hearing, or smelling, or seeing, or feeling, or touching, or making love (uh, that's not a sense), but it's just that.
Oh, yes, you are right I was totally caught in a thought of fear. But that was part of writing this post - that one can be RIGHT in the midst of fear, and yet still let go.
The truth is I'm NOT surfing between exhilaration and terror. That's sometimes my interpretation after the fact. Right in the middle, it's simply a sweet ride.
And my! Alas, a story with no rabbits or walruses or cheshire cats, just hedgehogs and foxes?
Posted by: Evelyn Rodriguez | Jan 31, 2007 at 03:18 AM
As for grand theories (or any theory) of the world, what matter they? Swapping your theory for my theory is about as productive as a monkey swinging from one tree branch to another.
"I can tell you, honest friend, what to believe: believe life; it teaches better than book or orator." - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Posted by: Evelyn Rodriguez | Jan 31, 2007 at 03:34 AM
Wonderful post!
Keep creating,
Mike
Posted by: Michael Wagner | Jan 31, 2007 at 02:01 PM
You are definitely on a roll, Ev. Keep it up.
Thanks for understanding my book parody, as you know I am dead serious about spirituality, ethics, and core values.
I am all for seeking, but not the pampered, lazy "spiritual seeking" of mediocre Americans.
Even the best books (on most any topic, especially mystical and business) have only a few sentences that are worth anything, though we rightfully treasure those precious insights.
Spirituality requires total destruction of all comfort zones and safety nets.
The buzz words of buzz agenting, WOM, "viral marketing", Web 2.0, RIA (rich internet applications), social media, universal content utopia, absolute switched-on user empowerment, etc. are empty references to silly fluff in most cases.
Only a few really know how to implement and stick to such ideas over the long haul.
"We tried blogging, it didn't work", for example.
It takes about 6 years to accomplish anything with a blog, except for those few, inimitable exceptions.
Posted by: V-+a%S(p#E*rsT=`hE..]gra_Te[ | Jan 31, 2007 at 11:45 PM
My best marketing technique is to sound absolutely positive about everything I say, and then be totally gracious when I get corrected. Actually, being self-deprocating is a great tool. I am probably an idiot, but that's what I think.
Or is it "self-deficating"?
Posted by: Heather Flanagan | Feb 12, 2007 at 10:30 PM
I have gone through your site its good and excellent. and i found many interesting things to read and to gathered information about it, so here i am linking u relevant site to gain more details.
http://www.greatmarketingstuff.com/blog
Posted by: www.greatmarketingstuff.com/blog | Apr 11, 2007 at 01:46 AM
I would appreciate it if someone asked me if they could use the image of my painting on their website.
Please get back to me on this.
Fleur Palau
Posted by: Fleur Palau | Aug 04, 2010 at 05:07 PM
I might add the image is copyright, and if not removed within 24 hours they face legal action.This refers to the girl going down rabbit hole with rabbit.
Fleur Palau
Posted by: Fleur Palau | Aug 04, 2010 at 07:18 PM