"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams." - Eleanor Roosevelt
Are you failing at sequestering and segregating yourself into the molds that creativity is confined by these days? I am. Without going into the long story, I have tabled a long-standing narrative alternate reality game (ARG) that I've been working on for over a year.
Why?
I realized that there was a far more direct path to what I wanted to achieve than an ARG. (It was a means to an end.)
If what Ana Mendieta's work was is called body art, and Patrick Dougherty's sculptures are environmental art, then maybe what I'm/we're going to attempt might be called "aether art," after the archaic spelling of the fifth element.
My art seeks to challenge prevailing notions of "impossibility."
While walking in Manhattan last week, I saw an HSBC billboard: "O.3% of Saharan solar energy could power Europe. Do you see a world of potential? We do."
I am more than aware that many folks are more focused on what's wrong, and who's to blame. I am not concerned with them. Do you see a world of potential? How do you crystallize these types of visions?
The thing with "aether art" is its mostly invisible to the naked eye. Aether art is basically daydreaming taken up to the level of an art form. And although aether art ends up materializing in matter eventually, there is no way I know of to prove any linkage between the imagination and the materialization. So the world of matter tends to be one of unsigned artworks. Yet like Leonardo daVinci, we'll keep a notebook of our imaginary inventions and vibrant visions to serve as an artifact and as our studio/stetchbook.
If you're familiar with ideas from books like The Power, by Rhonda Byrne (also author of The Secret) and the teachings of Esther and Jerry Hicks (for instance, the metaphor of the stream of life), you'll have a clue to what I'm aiming at. However, the caveat being I don't buy into notion of the "Law of Attraction" in the same sense (for instance, I don't really regard thoughts to be the medium of the canvas, metaphorically).
The second caveat is I'm interested in invention, I know you can "manifest" a ripe plum or a Mercedes Benz with equal ease. While most of these teachings focus on creating things you're already familiar with such as jewelry, cars, real estate or situations like a new job, I am not. That's called shopping. Nothing necessarily wrong with shopping. Simply I am inclined toward inventing new and never-been-yet, or at least remixing the ready-made objects into something original.
I keep saying "we" because I'd like you to take your dreams into reality, too. I believe it was the same night I saw the "Do you see a world of potential?" billboard, that I went to see an exhibit of Brion Gysin's artworks at the New Museum. In 1958, he moved into a residence hotel in Paris that also housed William Burroughs, Allen Ginsberg, and Gregory Corso. It was affectionately dubbed The Beat Hotel. The curator noted because of the intense interaction between the artists (especially productive between Burroughs and Gysin), "Gysin's four years at the so-called "Beat Hotel" would be his most productive of his entire career."
I work best if I can have peers as a sounding board. Maybe you do too? There's more. I'm hoping to magnetize and galvanize a very creative group of people that is able to catapult all of us into larger possibilities than we could have conceived of solely ourselves.
“I'm not a teacher, but an awakener.” - Robert Frost
I'll go into this more in future posts. It's all going to be public. And I'm going to refrain from self-help teaching (I'll still offer original opinions) as it's not necessarily my foremost passion. I want to connect with peers, and the student-teacher relationship precludes that.
Even the idea of "awakener" can be construed in some hierarchical sense. My slant is towards awaking what's already a seed in you and having that be nurtured toward growth.
When I worked part-time at a hat store that stocked probably a hundred styles, people often gravitated immediately to their ideal (not always), and if it truly were a click everyone would exclaim, "Oh, that's you!" I'm looking to encourage people to yield to the aspirations that truly fit them, not making anyone conform to my style, or prevailing popular ones necessarily either. I may cite copious resources in the footnotes perhaps, and hope you're either (a) already familiar with the application of the material or (b) able and willing to experiment on your own. The focus is all on what imagine and create in our world and examples of folks that are suspending disbelief and imagining the so-called impossible, rather than any how-to's.
A lovely sense of creative camaderie that really speaks to me is captured in a snippet of an interview in Iceland:
"I ask Larus [1] about the creative buzz in the Reykjavik[, Iceland] air. Where does it come from--and how can I get some?"
He presses his glasses against his nose.
"Envy."
"What about it?"
"There's not much in Iceland."
The lack of envy he's talking
about is a bit different from what I saw in Switzerland. The Swiss
suppress envy by hiding things. Icelanders suppress envy by sharing
them. Icelandic musicians help one another out, Larus explains. If one
band needs an amp or a lead guitarist, another band will help them out,
no questions asked. Ideas, too, flow freely, unencumbered by envy, that
most toxic of the seven deadly sins. Once unleashed, writes Joseph
Epstein in his treatise on the subject, "envy tends to diminish all in
whom it take possession."
This relative lack of envy is one sure sign of a Golden Age, says
Peter Hall. Here he is describing turn-of-the-century Paris but could
just as easily be describing twenty-first-century Reykjavik: "They
lived and worked in each other's pockets. Any innovation, any new
trend, was immediately known, and could be freely incorporated into the
work of any of the others." In other words, the Paris artists of 1900
[more accurately, 1900-1920s] believed in open-source software. [2] So, too, do Icelanders. Sure, they compete, but in the way the
word was originally intended. The roots of the word "compete" are the
Latin competure, which means to "seek with."
... But I still sensed I was missing something. How can it be that
this flyspeck of a nation produces more artists and writers per capita
than any other?
"It's because of failure," Says Larus, pushing his glasses hard against the bridge of his nose.
"Failure?"
"Yes, failure doesn't carry a stigma in Iceland. In fact, in a way we admire failures."
... The more I thought about this, the more sense it made. For if you are free to fail, you are free to try.
... There's no one on the island telling them that they're not good
enough, so they just go ahead and sing and paint and write." - Eric Weiner, The
Geography of Bliss: One Grumps Search for the World's Happiest Places
[1] A bit more about Larus whom the author interviewed: "In forty-odd years,
Larus has earned a living not only as a chess player but also as a
journalist, a construction-company executive, a theologian, and, now, a
music producer. "I know," he says, sensing my disbelief. "But that kind
of resume is completely normal in Iceland."
[2] Hailing from the software industry, I know that open
source software developers tend to collaborate on a common project,
whereas each of the "Golden Age" artists had their own body of
work. I'm more keen on you creating your work of art, than necessarily jumping into a bandwagon that may not be your true calling.
Bonus: I gave a copy of
The Power, by Rhonda Byrne to someone close to me. Their remarks after a few chapters. Long sigh, then: "I wish it were that easy.
I have too much to worry about." Soon after, I happen to read the following paragraph. Yes, our minds will continuously harp on the impossibilities and seeming unsurmountable odds. But we're not attempting brain surgery, it's heart work. Something we can all tap into:
"I dedicate all of my work to the more beautiful world our hearts tell
us is possible. I say our "hearts", because our minds tell us it is not
possible. Our minds doubt that things will ever be much different than
experience has taught us. You may, as you read the forgoing encomium to
a sacred economy, have felt a wave of cynicism, contempt, or despair.
You might have felt an urge to dismiss my words as hopelessly
idealistic. Indeed, I myself was tempted to tone down my description,
to make it more plausible, more responsible, more in line with our low
expectations for what life and the world can be. But such an
attenuation would not have been the truth. I will, using the tools of
the mind, speak what is in my heart. In my heart I know that an economy
and society this beautiful is possible for us to create, and indeed,
that anything less than that is unworthy of us." - Charles Eisenstein, "Sacred Economics" (in Reality Sandwich magazine)
ART CREDITS: Noeltykay's Bottom of the Ocean Floor and Top of the World; Ana Mendieta's Tree of Life; Luke Jerram's Aeolus; Ana Mendieta's Alma Silhueta en Fuego.
Recent Comments